Updated: August 2026 · By Álvaro Arrescurrenaga · CEO of Voicit
18 questions
Scoring rubric 1–5
Updated August 2026
Short answer
A second interview should not repeat the first one with different people. Its job is to resolve the open questions from round one, test the core skills at depth, and let the candidate meet the people they would work with. Read the first-round notes before the call and build the questions from the flags in them.
The most common second interview is a slightly longer version of the first, with a different interviewer asking the same things. The candidate notices, and you learn nothing new. The 18 questions below are designed for round two: they assume a screen already happened, they go deeper where the first round was thin, and they add the things a screen cannot test — how the candidate thinks about the actual problems of the job.
Before round two: build the interview from round one’s notes
Start from what the first interviewer wrote. Every flag becomes a question; every strong example becomes a follow-up to check depth. Then add the parts a screen cannot cover: a real problem from the job, the team, and the candidate’s own questions. The table below is the structure we use.
Block
What it is for
Source
Follow up on round one
Resolve the flags and verify the strong examples
First-round notes
Depth on the core skills
Two or three competencies, two questions each, behavioral
The role’s scorecard
A real problem from the job
How they think about the work they would actually do
The hiring manager
Working style and team
How they will fit the way this team operates
Future colleagues
Their decision
What they still need to know to say yes
The candidate
Following up on the first round
In your first conversation you mentioned [the strongest example they gave]. Can you walk me through it again, in more detail — what did you do first?What a strong answer shows: The story holds up under detail: same facts, more specifics, and their own actions are clear.Red flag: The story changes, or the detail reveals that the work was mostly someone else’s.
One thing we wanted to understand better is [the flag from round one]. Can you tell me more about that?What a strong answer shows: A direct answer that resolves the question, even if the answer is a limitation.Red flag: They deflect, or the answer contradicts what they said in round one.
Since we last spoke, what have you found out about us, and has anything changed your view of the role?What a strong answer shows: They did some homework and have a sharper question or a concern. Both are good signs.Red flag: Nothing has changed and they have not looked. Interest without curiosity.
What did you take away from the first conversation about what this job really needs?What a strong answer shows: An accurate reading of the role, including the hard parts, and something they would want to clarify.Red flag: A generic description that could have come from the posting alone.
Depth on the core skills
Tell me about the most difficult [task central to this role] you have handled. What made it difficult, and what did you do about it?What a strong answer shows: A situation at the right level, the specific difficulty named, their own actions, and the outcome.Red flag: The difficulty is other people, and the actions are vague.
Describe a time you got that same kind of work wrong. What happened afterwards?What a strong answer shows: A real mistake, its consequences, and a concrete change to how they do it now.Red flag: They have never got it wrong. Nobody who has done real work has never got it wrong.
Walk me through how you would approach [a realistic first-90-days problem in this role]. Not the plan — the first two weeks.What a strong answer shows: They ask clarifying questions, start with understanding rather than action, and can say what they would want to know before deciding anything.Red flag: A confident plan built entirely on assumptions, with no questions.
Who is the best person you have worked with in [this function], and what did they do that you have copied?What a strong answer shows: A specific person, a specific practice, and evidence they actually adopted it.Red flag: They cannot name anyone, or the practice is generic.
What part of this kind of work do you find tedious, and how do you make sure it still gets done well?What a strong answer shows: Honesty about what they dislike and a mechanism that keeps quality up anyway.Red flag: They love all of it, or the tedious part simply does not get done.
A real problem from the job
Here is a situation we are actually dealing with right now: [describe a real, non-confidential problem]. How would you think about it?What a strong answer shows: They ask questions before answering, name the trade-offs, and offer a first step rather than a full solution.Red flag: An instant answer with no questions, or a refusal to engage without more information.
What would you need from me, as your manager, to do this job well in the first six months?What a strong answer shows: Specific asks: context, access, a clear priority, feedback cadence. It tells you how to manage them.Red flag: «Nothing, I’m very independent» — every new hire needs something.
What is the first thing you would want to change here, based on what you have seen so far?What a strong answer shows: A cautious, specific observation, framed as a question rather than a verdict.Red flag: A list of everything that is wrong with the company after two conversations.
If you took this job and it did not work out, what do you think the most likely reason would be?What a strong answer shows: Self-awareness: a real risk about them, the role, or the fit, stated plainly.Red flag: They cannot imagine it failing, or the only risk is the company.
Working style, team and their decision
Describe how your last team ran its week: meetings, planning, how work got assigned. What worked and what didn’t?What a strong answer shows: A concrete description with a critical eye, and awareness of what they would change.Red flag: Everything was great, or everything was broken.
Tell me about a manager you did not get on with. What did you do?What a strong answer shows: They adapted something specific, had a direct conversation, and can describe the manager fairly.Red flag: The manager is a villain, and the story ends with the candidate leaving.
What kind of feedback do you find hardest to hear, and how do you want it delivered?What a strong answer shows: A real answer that helps you manage them, plus an example of taking it well.Red flag: «I welcome all feedback» with nothing behind it.
What do you still need to know to decide whether you would accept an offer?What a strong answer shows: Specific open questions: scope, the team, the manager, compensation details. Answer them now if you can.Red flag: Nothing. Either they have decided, or they are not thinking about it seriously.
Where else are you in the process, and what is your timeline for deciding?What a strong answer shows: Honest information you can use to plan the offer.Red flag: None — it is a planning question. Write the answer down.
How to score the second round
Use the same rubric as round one for the competencies, and add one line for the problem discussion. Then write a recommendation with the evidence behind it. The debrief should compare notes, not impressions.
Score
What it means
Typical evidence
1
Round one did not hold up
Stories changed or thinned under detail
2
Consistent but shallow
Same examples, no new depth, generic problem discussion
3
Solid
Examples held up, a real mistake, a sensible approach to the problem
4
Strong
Above, plus good questions about the problem and clear asks of their manager
5
Exceptional
Above, plus they taught the panel something about the problem
Stop writing up interviews by hand. Voicit records the interview, transcribes it and fills your scorecard against the competencies you defined — so you can listen instead of typing.
What questions should be asked in a second interview?
Questions built from the first round: follow-ups on the strongest example and on any flag, two behavioral questions per core competency, a real problem from the job to think through together, and the candidate’s own open questions. Do not repeat the screen.
How is a second interview different from the first?
The first round filters on must-haves and motivation. The second tests depth: whether the examples hold up under detail, how the candidate thinks about the actual work, and how they would fit the team. It usually involves the hiring manager and future colleagues rather than the recruiter.
Who should conduct the second interview?
The hiring manager, plus one or two people the candidate would work with. Give each interviewer a different block (skills, the problem, working style) so the candidate is not asked the same thing three times, and share the first-round notes with all of them beforehand.
How long should a second interview be?
Forty-five to sixty minutes per interviewer. If several people are involved, run them back to back with short breaks and a clear agenda sent to the candidate in advance, rather than one two-hour panel.
What are red flags in a second interview?
Stories that change or thin out when you ask for detail; no homework done between rounds; a confident plan for the real problem with no questions asked; a manager described as a villain; and no open questions of their own about the role.
Voicit records interviews and meetings, transcribes them and writes the report against the template each team defines. These question sets come from working with recruitment consultancies and in-house talent teams across Europe.
Manage cookie consent
We use cookies to improve your experience. You can accept all cookies or configure them. See our cookie policy for more information.
Functional
Always active
Storage or technical access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication through an electronic communications network.
Preferences
Storage or technical access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
Storage or technical access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The storage or technical access is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a requirement, voluntary compliance by your Internet Service Provider, or additional third-party logging, information stored or retrieved solely for this purpose cannot be used to identify you.
Marketing
Storage or technical access is necessary to create user profiles for sending advertising, or to track the user across one or more websites for similar marketing purposes.